From T.O. to OCHOCINCO!

Two of NFL's most famed players is Chad Ochocinco and Terrell Owens. The two are highly recognized for their football careers, but has also to over center stage with their personalities and of field actions. Now that the two are on the same team they no longer have to worry about competing against one another on field, but the two friends are now competing prime time. Both athletes are featured on reality based T.V shows, where they are the center of attention.

Caylan Davis reported that VH1's latest ratings reported that Ochocinco is stealing the scene with a total of 844,000 viewers compared to Terrell Owens 733,00 viewers (2010). While this may not seem like a huge number, for two men that seem to love competition this is a nice head start. However the t.v. shows are totally different as far as the types of shows they are. While T.O. allows fans to get a glimpse of his life on the off season, Chad has decided, like many others before him, that it is time for him to look for love. Of course what better way for Mr. Ochocinco to do this then star in a show on VH1, where he has 85 women to choose from.

While most will enjoy the bold and commanding presence of Terrell Owens, others prefer to watch the always surprising Chad. However there's also those few individuals who are tired of the non stop reality shows, and may simply choose to ignore both shows. I personally really like Chad Ochocino, he's a great player and has brought a difference presence on the field. However T.O show is more about him and his personal life, when he is not on the field. There has been so many dating shows over the last few years, that seeing a 100 women compete for one guy, is just not that interesting anymore. So, in all one can assume that T.O. still has a a little more appeal as far as the shows. The real competition will start when these two are on the field together.

Reference

Retrieved from http://www.nesn.com/2010/07/terrell-owens-plays-second-fiddle-to-chad-ochocinco-in-reality-show-ratings.html

Stephen King: King of Movies and Books?

Stephen King Has accumulated many fans over the years. Some appreciate his books,that have made it to the big screens. However there are many who feel that his movies do not accurately represent the books and he has not progressed as time has. This is a issue that true fans can identify with.

According to Mark Brown, Stephen King has been able to overcome the general classification, that many writers and directors have conform to. However some fell he may need a change. A large amount of individuals feel the adaptations of the books are disappointing. Although one can ask themselves is this because of the types of movies we have come accustom to, or is because they simply do not have the same affect on the audience as the books do?

For instance, the movie "Dreamcatcher" , could not be explained in detail, as it is in the book. For someone who has read the book, this was somewhat of a disappointment. While the overall concept of the movie was displayed, it lacked some of the background information; which gave the story substance and clarification.

Again, I feel there's need to ask if this is because of the violence and graphics, that we have began to expect whenever we watch in films and games. King seems to take a more classic approach, when turning his books to films. The movies represent classic horror films, instead of the gory movies that are produced today. His films, which may be lacking in one department are a representation of true horror/suspense films.

Some of King's most recognized work is, "Carrie", "Creepshow 1 & 2", "Stand by Me", "The Green Mile", and of course " The Shining". All of the films represent thrilling yet classic approach to horror films. There is some gore in these films, but for the most part they tell their stories, without the aide of special effects and an obscene amount of blood (excluding Carrie).

Honesty I feel that for the most parts Stephen Kings movies are accurate reflections of his books. Of course if one takes into consideration that a vast majority of Kings novels are lengthy, then they'll realize that it is impossible for them to match their movie counter parts perfectly. Over the years I feel that some of his films are lacking in certain ways, but this can be said about lots of movies, regardless if they are from books or not. Understanding that Stephen King is not the typically writer or producer, is the first step to understanding his movies. Most writers may not take such a large role in producing their movies, however King has had a great presence in the production of all his films. Some say this is his downfall, while others may feel this is why he has lasted so long, and continues to be one of the greatness writers around.

References

(2010).Stephen King on the big screen. Journal of Popular Culture, 43(4), 901-903. doi.10.1111/j.1540-5931.2010.00776_2.x.